|
Is our district demographically disadvantaged?
At a press conference about our recent API scores, a representative of the District
tried, off the record, to explain our low API scores as compared with certain other
Districts on the grounds that they have a greater percentage of Asian students. This
inspired me to look at the numbers to determine for myself if there is any truth in
this. I then began to look at other factors and the project mushroomed into what you
see here.
First, on this page I will present the raw data that I have assembled so far.
Then, at the bottom of this page, I will provide links to a series of charts, tables and
analysis based on such data. Please note that all of this data was obtained from
websites sponsored by the California Department of Education.
I am not ready to draw any final conclusions at this point, because I am still thinking
about how all of this fits together. Any ideas that you want to e-mail to me would
be appreciated.
My tentative conclusions are as follows:
1. Our supposed shortage of Asian students is not a material factor.
2. We have the largest number of teachers per student of any district in the
state (that I have been able to identify) and a larger than average number of
administrators.
3. The strongest correlations relate to % of students eligible for free/reduced
price lunches and to % of English learners, but these correlations don't explain our lower
than expected scores. I believe that we need to spend some time analyzing the ways
that other districts (particularly Palo Alto) are generating higher levels of academic
achievement from such students.
4. We are not efficiently deploying our resources. The level of
automation/computerization throughout the district is deplorably low. We are running
a pen and pencil district in a computer age, which is resulting in an enormous annual
waste of funds.
5. We are not adequately involving teachers or parents in curriculum decisions,
nor are we doing nearly enough in developing a curriculum that promotes skills &
achievement in English/Language Arts or math.
I plan to post, in the near future, my proposed list of the top ten ideas for improving
academic performance in our district. I would love to hear from you about what you
think we should do. Please click here to e-mail
me.
1. Comparison with districts in Los Angeles County. |
|
Annual |
|
# |
# |
# |
|
% |
|
Free/re- |
|
Revenue |
|
elem |
middle |
high |
% |
UC-CSU |
English |
duced price |
District |
Per ADA |
ADA |
schools |
schools |
schools |
asian |
eligible |
Learners |
meals |
Arcadia |
$
4,941 |
9,161
|
6 |
3 |
1 |
54.00% |
57.30% |
16.60% |
8.30% |
BHUSD |
$
7,173 |
5,131
|
4 |
0 |
1 |
10.70% |
64.80% |
7.30% |
7.50% |
Culver
City |
$
5,354 |
5,658
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
10.20% |
34.60% |
19.40% |
37.90% |
La
Canada |
$
5,253 |
4,146
|
3 |
0 |
1 |
26.10% |
69.60% |
4.20% |
0.70% |
Las
Virgenes |
$
4,957 |
11,295
|
8 |
2 |
2 |
7.60% |
59.00% |
3.80% |
2.80% |
Palos
Verdes |
$
5,151 |
9,240
|
12 |
2 |
1 |
29.30% |
76.40% |
11.90% |
2.00% |
San
Marino |
$
5,566 |
3,012
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
64.40% |
85.20% |
6.30% |
0.70% |
Santa
Monica |
$
5,927 |
11,459
|
10 |
2 |
2 |
5.60% |
67.80% |
14.30% |
25.90% |
S.
Pasadena |
$
5,206 |
3,723
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
31.10% |
73.50% |
7.20% |
10.80% |
Walnut
Valley |
$
4,940 |
14,273
|
9 |
3 |
1 |
44.50% |
61.00% |
7.00% |
7.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pupils |
|
Pupils |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
# |
per |
# |
per |
|
Pupils |
High |
High |
|
|
Admini- |
Admini- |
Pupil |
Pupil |
# |
per |
School |
School |
|
District |
strators |
strator |
svcs |
svcs |
Teachers |
teacher |
API |
API |
|
Arcadia |
29.8 |
315.1 |
28.5 |
329.5 |
400.7 |
23.4 |
795 |
795 |
|
BHUSD |
19.7 |
269.1 |
25.8 |
205.5 |
320.3 |
16.6 |
820 |
820 |
|
Culver
City |
23.4 |
256.3 |
18.4 |
325.9 |
273.3 |
21.9 |
649 |
649 |
|
La
Canada |
9.6 |
441.9 |
17.3 |
245.2 |
195 |
21.8 |
858 |
858 |
|
Las
Virgenes |
33.8 |
348.6 |
26.4 |
446.3 |
534 |
22.1 |
825/818 |
821.5 |
|
Palos
Verdes |
23 |
414.9 |
23.7 |
402.7 |
437.1 |
21.8 |
840 |
840 |
|
San
Marino |
10.4 |
296.8 |
6.4 |
482.3 |
148.3 |
20.8 |
868 |
868 |
|
Santa
Monica |
46 |
262.4 |
42.5 |
284 |
565 |
21.4 |
683/793 |
738 |
|
S.
Pasadena |
13.7 |
281.5 |
14.5 |
266 |
172.2 |
22.4 |
790 |
790 |
|
Walnut
Valley |
44.2 |
328.6 |
42.5 |
341.7 |
632.9 |
22.9 |
747 |
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Comparison with districts outside Los Angeles County. |
|
Annual |
|
# |
# |
# |
|
% |
|
Free/re- |
|
Revenue |
|
elem |
middle |
high |
% |
UC-CSU |
English |
duced price |
District |
Per ADA |
ADA |
schools |
schools |
schools |
asian |
eligible |
Learners |
meals |
BHUSD |
$
7,173 |
5,131
|
4 |
0 |
1 |
10.70% |
64.80% |
7.30% |
7.50% |
Piedmont |
$
5,977 |
2,639
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
19.90% |
83.30% |
2.40% |
0.10% |
Fremont |
$
5,261 |
29,627
|
30 |
5 |
5 |
30.00% |
43.30% |
12.40% |
17.40% |
Palo
Alto |
$
7,369 |
9,124
|
13 |
2 |
2 |
18.10% |
76.70% |
5.30% |
6.50% |
Oak
Park |
$
4,924 |
3,206
|
3 |
0 |
1 |
6.20% |
62.70% |
1.80% |
1.20% |
Laguna
Beach |
$
6,054 |
2,451
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1.90% |
57.50% |
3.80% |
9.70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pupils |
|
Pupils |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
# |
per |
# |
per |
|
Pupils |
High |
High |
|
|
Admini- |
Admini- |
Pupil |
Pupil |
# |
per |
School |
School |
|
District |
strators |
strator |
svcs |
svcs |
Teachers |
teacher |
API |
API |
|
BHUSD |
19.7 |
269.1 |
25.8 |
205.5 |
320.3 |
16.6 |
820 |
820 |
|
Piedmont |
11.8 |
229.4 |
11.6 |
233.4 |
155.1 |
17.5 |
906 |
906 |
|
Fremont |
83 |
372.5 |
85 |
363.8 |
1444.2 |
21.4 |
888/767/692/689/646 |
736.4 |
|
Palo
Alto |
42.1 |
230.9 |
36.1 |
269.3 |
553.4 |
17.6 |
885/852 |
868.5 |
|
Oak
Park |
9.4 |
352.7 |
6.3 |
526.2 |
161.9 |
20.5 |
846 |
846 |
|
Laguna
Beach |
7.2 |
357.1 |
6 |
428.5 |
114.2 |
22.5 |
822 |
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 1998-1999 fiscal year (revenue data 97/8)-- all data derived from
Ed-Data & California |
|
|
Department of Education websites. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click on the lines below to see charts & analysis re the potential factors listed.
Again, my goal is to determine which factors are most important, so that I can
better understand why certain other districts have significantly higher APIs.
Percentage of Asian students.
Percentage of English learners.
Revenues per student (ADA).
Pupils per administrator.
Pupils per teacher.
Free/reduced price meals.
[ Home ] [ Up ] [ 1999 API - Elementaries ] [ 1999 API - High School ] [ API analysis - main ]
|